web technology is a way of life
21 Jun
Why do tracking/analytics companies want their code placed at the top of the page (meaning below the opening tag) to be properly tracked? If a user exits quickly they should not be tracked. It seems quite duplicitous to track a user that has exited a page before it has even finished loading. Granted if you have a site that takes a bit to load you shouldn’t wait till everything on the page loads, otherwise you’d never realize that your page load time results in lost visitors. But if a user exits a page or clicks away very quickly that visit doesn’t really count. It would be like Nielsen tracking every channel I skip when I surf TV using the channel up button.
I also simply can not believe it when a tracking company claims that their code will not be guaranteed to work if placed in the <head> of the document or if the code is wrapped inside a generic tracking function. If your code can’t be wrapped or placed in the <head> what did you do wrong in the first place, or what kind of tricks are you trying to pull? I don’t like to always use the exact code provided by these companies when working on a client website. Your client’s needs for analytics may result in them changing tracking companies and then the developer would be forced to make widespread changes across a site to deal with such change. Granted this type of change is not all that frequent, but it does happen and being prepared is far easier than redoing work.
I’m also not convinced that the analytics provided by many companies is accurate enough. I’ve seen on many occasions that raw stats provide disparaging numbers when put against 3rd party companies and even between multiple 3rd party tracking companies when used together on the same page. When the numbers of hits you receive on your site is the means for convincing ad placement or other financing I think that accuracy is quite important.
18 Sep
Today Avinash Kaushik of Google and the author of Web Analytics: An Hour a Day spoke this week at Web 2.0 here in NY and today to a private audience at the kb+p offices. This was a great experience. He is a very inteligent and funny person, who really made analytics feel like more than dry numbers. He definately gave me a lot to think about and put a number of great ideas into my head for how to really let web analytics really produce results and improve the goals of the site.
There were three important things (among others) that I gained from his talk:
11 Sep
I would like a web analytics platform that focused on the results of analysis and not the numbers. I came up with the idea of visitor profiles that could be used to gauge the high level understanding of visitors. Then when you want to truly understand your visitors you dive into the data along with your masters degree.
My idea for profiles consists of grouping many data points into categories. Here are just 4 profiles for an average site, many more could be created based on the content and focus of the site. These profiles can be adjusted to look at data for the whole site or simply sections of it:
Bouncer - The type of visitor that reaches your site and leaves immediately, something often seen when users visit from banners or paid search links. Less than 2 page views in 30 seconds or less.
Browser - A visitor that wants to see everything on the site, yet they don’t stay anywhere long enough to actually intake the content. Views 90% of the pages on the site in less than 30 seconds per page (thus a site of 40 pages would consider a visitor a Browser even with a session of 18 minutes.)
Enthusiast - Someone that really explores and gains something by visiting your site. Views at least 40% of the site, but also performs such actions such as viewing videos to completion, filling out registration/send to friend forms, downloads content (basically a visitor that interacts with the content.)
Casual - This is the default bucket, they didn’t bounce, they didn’t try to surf the whole site faster than Michael Phelps and they didn’t interact a lot.)
These profiles can then be used to determine how the site is being used as a whole. So if your site launched a new feature and Bouncers increased overall or simply in that section then you need to look into why that happened. Or if changed your layout or navigation flow or appearance and Browsers weer the most popular profile, then you could establish that visitors were just trying to understand the new flow or were even lost trying to find the content they wanted. What you gather from the results may be speculative, but I’m sure it’s more than knowing that 1,675 visitors viewed 1.37 page views per session.
UPDATE: A while ago I found Quantcast and found it interesting but at the time it didn’t have a very significant base of data. But now that the company is a few years older, and to complete some more research into the space of Web Analytics I came across them again today. They have on their site a similiar concept to my ideas, that they label “Site Frequency”. I think this is right direction and should be something that they should expand on and make more prominent in their dashboard of data.
The Livescribe Pulse smartpen gets an app store. This little pen is quite amazing, and it just shows that the business model of an app store is already changing the market for every type of electronic device. So when does my…
The Ghostwire (DSiWare) game looks great and reminds me a lot of Fatal Frame.
FloorPlanner is an interesting bit of software built in Flash that allows you design your home in 2D and view in 3D.
The new Stargate Universe [Philosphocal] teaser looks awesome. I stopped watching Atlantis a bit ago because it got boring, I hope this pumps up the energy as BSG did. It has Lou Diamond Philips and Ming-Na in it, that could make…
Here’s a plethora of well designed RSS Feed icons for free!